Wind River Competitors or Alternatives

Wind River's top competitors include Green Hills Software, Lynx and Concurrent-RT.

RANK

COMPANY

CEO

CEO RATING

EMPLOYEES

FUNDING

REVENUE

Wind River's company profile

Kevin Dallas

President & CEO

86/100
1,000 - 5,000
$0
$100M - 500M
1
Wind River's Competitor - Green Hills Software logo

Dan O'Dowd

President & CEO

67/100
1,000 - 5,000
- -
$1B - 5B
2
Wind River's Competitor - Lynx logo

Tim Reed

CEO

83/100
100 - 250
- -
$25M - 100M
3
Wind River's Competitor - Concurrent-RT logo

Ken Jackson

President & CEO

90/100
25 - 100
- -
$5M - 25M
4
Wind River's Competitor - Real-time Systems Gmbh logo

Gerd Lammers

President & CEO

65/100
500 - 1,000
- -
$5M - 25M
5
Wind River's Competitor - MontaVista logo

Sanjay Raina

General Manager

72/100
25 - 100
$21M
$5M - 25M

Wind River VS Green Hills Software

Green Hills Software is Wind River's top competitor. Green Hills Software is a Private company that was founded in Santa Barbara, California in 1982. Green Hills Software operates in the IOT industry. Green Hills Software has 800 fewer employees vs. Wind River.

Wind River VS Lynx

Lynx has been one of Wind River's top competitors. Lynx is headquartered in San Jose, California, and was founded in 1988. Lynx is in the IT Services field. Lynx generates 11% the revenue of Wind River.

Wind River VS Concurrent-RT

Concurrent-RT is perceived as one of Wind River's biggest rivals. Concurrent-RT was founded in 1985 in Pompano Beach, Florida. Concurrent-RT competes in the IOT field. Concurrent-RT generates $380M less revenue than Wind River.

Frequently Asked Questions about Wind River

  1. Who are Wind River's top competitors?

    Wind River's top 3 competitors are Green Hills Software, Lynx, Concurrent-RT.
  2. Who is similar to Wind River?

    Green Hills Software is the most similar to Wind River. Lynx and Concurrent-RT are also similar to Wind River.
  1. Are Wind River and Green Hills Software competitors?

    Yes, Green Hills Software is one of Wind River’s top competitors.